|Summary:||This project brought together three urban localities in the 2 Seas programme area to examine, test and improve methods of delivering services to improve social inclusion for those people most disadvantaged. The local authority partnership (Southampton, Gent and Rotterdam) worked together to look at examples of best practice and services in social inclusion; to bring together professionals who work to combat social exclusion (both directly and indirectly) and to test innovative methods of improving the position of those people who suffer from exclusion in our communities and neighbourhoods.
The project aimed to solve some of the common problems identified by the partners, improving services that are delivered to the public and providing a record of evaluated local test projects, policies and schemes which are transferable to the wider 2 Seas programme area and beyond.
The project examined how elements of ‘peer review’ can be incorporated into project activities and embracing the fact that partners all had differing strengths in certain areas of social inclusion which the other partners in the project could benefit from and test out. The project also provided a foundation on which further co-operation between the urban areas could flourish. A key area of focus was on providng direct examples of the changing nature of services to tackle social exclusion and how they can be most effective in a challenging economic climate.
|Timeframe:||01.01.2009 - 31.12.2011|
|Total project budget:||€ 2 310 100|
|Total amount of ERDF requested:||€ 1 154 150|
|Grant rate:||49 %|
|Web address:||No link available at the moment|
The main aim of the TSE project was to provide the project partners with the means to examine, test and improve service delivery to improve social inclusion in their respective areas and also to be able to provide a record of this which was transferrable to other urban areas in the 2 Seas region and beyond.
The project’s objectives were to allow managers, policy makers, and those involved in the delivery of projects and programmes to gain from a partnership with other urban areas by:
- Observing practice which takes place in the other cities
- To test out innovative new actions
- To transfer expertise
- Benefitting from the ability to see new approaches taking place where there are contextual differences.
Activities implemented by the TIME project include the following:
- 8 discussion/information exchanges on relevant themes (including employment, disability, access to services)
- Development of 4 case studies
- A comparative analysis (shared activity with Activity 1)
- A ‘database’ of highlighted areas of good practice in social inclusion as recommended by the cities
Activity 3 aimed to provide practical working examples of services for socially excluded groups. The activity provided the resources for the three partner cities to test out initiatives in their respective local areas. The activities were carried out locally, but with input from the other partner cities who visited the local projects as part of a transnational study visit (hosted 1 per partner, per year). The project partners were able to learn from the processes undertaken (the good and bad points), whether the activity itself was successful, the framework within which the activity exists (politically, physically, economically etc..) and whether the activity, or elements of it could be replicated elsewhere.
Practically, the activities comprise Social exclusion test activities in three partner cities:
- SOUTHAMPTON (Catering training scheme, Services for individuals with higher support needs, User Group, Engaging with people in areas of social housing, Employment support for care leavers / young offenders)
-ROTTERDAM (Watch Out Security / Community work project, REVIT (later called new influx into the harbour), City Stewards, Care, and in depth research / evaluation activities)
-GENT (Accessibility tools, Awareness raising activities, Improving accessibility in the Horeca sector, Improving accessibility in events and tourism, Improving employment for disabled people within the city administration)
And activity evaluations (incorporating peer reviews) of all locally tested activity; Transnational study visits to view the activities (incorporating round-table discussions of relevant workers) and the development of toolkits related to the work in the partner cities
ACTIVITY 1 - STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT & DIRECTION; PARTNERSHIPS & STRUCTURES:
9 transnational study visits;
8 formal discussions
4 case studies
ACTIVITY 2 - THEMES, THEORIES & APPROACHES – CRITICAL FACTORS IN SOCIAL INCLUSION:
9 transnational study visits
8 transnational seminars
4 case studies
Comparative analysis (with Activity 2)
ACTIVITY 3 - LOCAL INTERVENTION & PEER REVIEW:
9 Transnational study visits
8 Round table discussions
16 Social inclusion test activities
3 activity evaluations
All project partners benefitted from the activities undertaken and their results, as all project partners were involved in all the activities of the project. In particular, partner city representatives from all three partner were present at all project meetings / study visits / discussions and talks.
In addition to this, all three partner cities hosted a visit to their city per year. In all of these activities, those involved were individuals working to tackle social exclusion in the cities. The beneficiaries of the project were as follows:
- Public administration / Local Authority staff – practitioners and managers
- Other organisations and their staff involved in the project activities (health services, community and voluntary organisations, NGOs, other local and national public bodies)
- Those individuals benefitting from service improvements and those who received services as part of the test activities in the cities (final beneficiaries)
The outcomes realised by the project are manifold. The major outcome is the increase in the number of professionals and practitioners in the field of social inclusion gaining expertise and working with cross border partners, in order to increase capacity and competnecy levels to deal with the current issues of social inclusion. The TSE project also allowed for an increased number of innovative pilot projects to be run and evaluated for their impact upon social inclusion, which lead to an increased number of individuals benefitting from interventions relating to social inclusion and bringing more marginal areas of society in to the mainstream.
Through a genuinely successful partnership of relevant actors in three countries, the TSE project has been able to:
- Develop materials transferrable to a pan-EU audience to enable actors to improve social inclusion in their respective cities.
- Provide practitioners with the opportunity to work with peers from their own field / outside of their own field, and across borders – the impact of which is further learning, understanding, and self-development.
- Provide a common understanding of issues relating to social exclusion / inclusion across the 2 Seas area.
- Provide the project partners themselves with the opportunity to develop further projects and initiatives.
- Provide the project partners with examples of best-practice from other countries which have the potential to be replicated and implemented elsewhere.
At various times during the project’s implementation, the TSE project has linked with the following organisations / networks / projects:
- Shaping 24 – an Interreg IVA 2 Seas partnership between Gent (BE) and Norwich (UK) which explores the link between culture, heritage and tourism
- EUROCITIES – in particular the Social Affairs Forum and Cities for Active Inclusion
- EAPN (European Anti Poverty Network)
- European Social Network - www.esn-eu.org
The strength of the partnership is probably one of the key factors in cross border working. Spending time on building and maintaining a successful working partnership is paramount. Ensuring all partners are fully involved is key to the success of the project and often ensures the sustainability and long lasting effect of the project work. However, working with a large partnership (18) can mean decision-making is protracted so a smaller partnership might be preferable.
Cross border projects involve working with partners of different nationalities. Using multiple languages may be a problem but perhaps more significant are the cultural differences. Not only do these involve recognising the different ways organisations are structured and operate across borders but also the way people think and work. It takes time to understand and accommodate these differences and it is important that this is done at the start of the project; time spent on this will pay dividends later.
The website will provide a forum for continuing to publicise the project’s results. Actual test activities taking place in the cities themselves have a longer lasting legacy. Some of the activities themselves are being continued as a result of having been tested as part of the TSE project.
Some examples are:
- In Southampton – the Catering training scheme (Calypso café) has secured funding to operate for one more year based upon the success of the pilot. The project to support young offenders will also continue due to its success in securing employment for many of the trainees.
- In Rotterdam – the scheme to train young people in the ports will continue as a result of the success of the TSE project – the companies themselves have agreed to fund the training in the future. The Care project is being adapted to further meet the needs of the trainees, as was demonstrated during the evaluation.
- In Gent – activities will take place to screen further sectors for accessibility. This has happened as a result of the success of other sectors and the processes carried out as a part of the TSE project.
The opportunity to work together closely over a three year period is very beneficial and is expected to lead to other projects and co-operation. Relationships developed at a peer-to-peer level are expected to reap results – with partners keen to replicate some of the work seen in the other cities, and the opportunity to contact the project partner for assistance / advice is certainly a possibility.
Test activities are continuing in some cases in all of the partner cities as a result of the TSE project.
Project partners will actively seek to further develop working relationships with the other project partners where opportunities are available. For example – a project related to ports and training for disadvantaged groups has been since developed involving Southampton and Rotterdam. There is also interest in possibly replicating some of the activities seen in Rotterdam in Southampton. The project partners in Gent still remain focussed upon accessibility and disability at the moment, although other departments of the administration may be interested in co-operation as a result of the previous partnership. Southampton would be likely to look to Gent for a partnership which looked at care / disability / health.